У нас тоже Дайсон и н лучший!!! До него пробавали разные и Томас и Вакс и Керхер, но Дайсону они и в подметки не годятся. А кирби я бы брать не стала, у меня знакомая взяла, так вот модель которую ей привезли сильно отличалась по силе всасывания от демонстрационной модели!!! У меня тоже Дайсон с электрощеткой, он считается аналогом Кирби, только не грохочет как отбойный молоток. У меня соседи если начинают пылесосить своим Кирби, так грохот стоит, как будто отбойный молоток включили. Дайсоном очень довольна, супер пылесос и без дополнительных расходных материалов.
У Кирби надо мешки покупать. Кирби - оч шумный пылесос! Друзья купили,их аж бесит сколько от него шума И у нас Дайсон. Но мы покупали 3 года назад. У нас самый простой,т. И еще у нашей модели труба не гибкая, то есть нельзя вокруг пылесоса обмотать, а только стоя стоит. Это меня бесит больше всего. Места занимает много,а у нас однушка. Вот хочу этот продать и купить маленький дайсон.
А вообще нравится. Мне кажется что он шумный по сравнению с мешочными пылесосами. У нас Кирби-я дольна как слон,я алергик на пыль-разница с обычным ощутимая. Удалить форматирование. Допустимо не более 75 смайлов. Отображать как ссылку. Они, безусловно, производят хорошие пылесосы. У моего друга есть Dyson V6, и я протестировал его, и я тоже очень впечатлен. Технология цифрового мотора довольно приятная.
Мощность всасывания тоже очень хорошая, и вы также можете купить моторизованные или не моторизованные ковровые щетки. Есть много привязанностей к пылесосам Dyson, но не так много, как к Kirbys. Качество немного проблематично для меня: все сделано из пластика. Хорошо, поэтому это легкий вес, что хорошо.
Дайсоны похожи на игрушки для детей - я нахожу это проблематичным, но некоторые люди любят красочные машины, так что это ваш выбор. Хотя чистка без мешка звучит убедительно, у вас есть проблема поддержания фильтров около девяти фильтров в Dysons в чистоте, чтобы поток воздуха оставался сильным. Я нахожу это проблематичным, но это только мое мнение. Так что бы я выбрал? Всегда Кирби. Но моя жена не стала бы этого делать. Потому что кирби тяжелы и иногда их нелегко маневрировать. У мистера Дайсона была очень хорошая идея с его машинами, но у основателей Kirby были также очень хорошие идеи.
Dyson Ltd - британская технологическая компания, которая разрабатывает и производит пылесосы, сушилки для рук, безклавишные вентиляторы, нагреватели и фены. Dyson производит 4 типа пылесосов -. Кирби предлагает 4 типа пылесоса. Kirby - это старая, основанная на технологиях компания по производству пылесосов, предоставляющая более удобный и простой в использовании пылесос. Я почти забыл опубликовать результаты этих двух важных тестов.
Как и следовало ожидать, Кирби уничтожил Дайсона и в этих тестах. Полный грязи на измерителе грязи, Дайсон вытащил 2,8, а Кирби вытащил 5,9 с сумкой, полной грязи. Кирби потерял силу, полную грязи вытащил семерку с пустым пакетом , но все еще был почти вдвое мощнее, полный грязи.
Дайсон вытащил 2,8 пустых и 2,8 полных, так что Дайсон был прав: он не потерял никакой силы, так как был заполнен грязью. В нашем тесте на грязь доминировал Кирби. Это потянуло почти вдвое больше грязи, чем сделал Дайсон. Я занимаюсь уборкой с года и использую Kirby для клиентов, которым принадлежит Dyson и другие топовые пылесосы, но когда я использую kirby, чтобы пылесосить ковер, который они уже пылесосили, они всегда сдуваются, чтобы увидеть, что пропустил их пылесос, и сколько это пропустил.
Когда я переключаю голову на шампунь, они начинают спрашивать цену и где купить кирби, пока их дорогая маленькая игрушка сидит в ожидании пожертвования. Это то, что было и будет всегда, и даже сейчас я все еще использую kirby в моем доме, когда он переходит от твердого пола к ковру без каких-либо изменений в производительности. Я даже могу полировать свои деревянные полы и плитку с помощью кирби, так что в конце концов этот вопрос будет легким да для кирби.
Какой другой вакуум может делать все это так хорошо и так долго? Хотя пылесосы бывают разных размеров, цветов и стилей, все они имеют общую структуру и предоставляют пользователям огромные преимущества. Этот инструмент оснащен мощным двигателем, который позволяет устройству всасывать все нежелательные элементы на поверхности и даже в воздухе.
Вы наверняка заметите большую разницу в результатах, когда вы используете пылесос, а не выполняете задачи по очистке вручную. Если ваш ковер грязный, несомненно, существует множество вариантов очистки на выбор. Это включает; покупка машины для чистки ковров или даже ее аренда, а также найм профессионала для уборки. Мы перепробовали их все. Проверенные и одобренные машины для чистки ковров, которые действительно доказали свою эффективность.
Чистка ковров действительно необходима в домах, и в следующих обзорах десятка лучших средств для чистки ковров в домашних условиях описывает те, которые наиболее эффективны в использовании. Если вы хотите узнать больше о пылесосах Полное руководство по покупке лучшего пылесоса вы можете посетить.
Недавно я написал статью об этом, сравнивая последнюю модель Kirby, Avalir 2 с новейшей полноразмерной Dyson Upright, Big Ball Animal 2. Они действительно очень разные пылесосы, и хотя Kirby - более высокий исполнитель, существует огромный Ценник прилагается для этого, и для большинства людей вопрос будет: действительно ли мне нужна такая высокая производительность и функциональность? Проверьте мою статью для более подробной информации:.
Я занимаюсь уборкой. Вы никогда не увидите никого в клининговом бизнесе, использующего пылесос Dyson или подобного типа. Они чистят неравномерно, они ломаются, они пропускают пыль без мешков , их трудно обслуживать, и они сильно завышены. Кирби чрезвычайно надежны, могут быть исправлены и намного более чисты в эксплуатации.
Прежде всего я должен сказать, что и Дайсон, и Кирби - хорошие пылесосы. Дайсон современен, а Кирби - классика. Пылесосы Dyson хорошие и мои любимые, но я должен сказать, что они не глубокие уборщики. Наоборот, Кирби хорошо себя чувствует в глубокой чистке и длится долго.
Но они завышены и тяжелы. Поэтому вы должны подумать, прежде чем выбирать между ними, что вы хотите. Проверьте отзывы, чтобы вы могли определить. Я скажу для Dyson V8. Это очень хорошая машина. Это с батарейным питанием и портативный.
|Пылесос dyson v6 обзор||435|
|Dyson v6 fluffy vs dc62||Сушилка для рук автоматическая dyson|
|Вентилятор dyson cool цена||468|
|Dyson best buy||No belt change yet? It seems there is an attachment for everything. Are the attachments easy to use? Общее замечание для обоих сравнений: А почему они наоборот не пропылесосили? Объявление Грамотность Авито Аккумулятор.|
|Пылесос dyson безпроводной||363|
|Аналог пылесосам дайсон||Дайсон кто производитель|
This keeps the weight at the bottom of the vacuum, again making it easier to move around. Within this is the cyclone system that Dyson vacuums use. The cyclones spin the dirt and dust around the filters so that the primary filter can remain clean, and so the vacuum can continue to clean efficiently, regardless of how full it is.
The three different tools that come with the Dyson Ball Animal 2 are all able to be attached to the wand of the vacuum, so that they are within easy reach. In terms of its size, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 measures In contrast, the Kirby Avalir 2 measures This means that it is a lot bulkier than the Dyson, and weighs a little more. This is partly because it is made of light-weight metal rather than plastic. They are both heavy and cumbersome, but the Dyson is a lot more streamlined.
The Kirby Avalir 2, on the other hand, has a much more traditional design. The brush head is very bulky, with a dome shape to house the motor and help with the suction sitting directly behind the brush. Then the Dustbin comes up, running parallel but separate to the wand. In order to pick the different functions, you choose the function by the brush head and adjust it accordingly.
For many aspects, such as switching from carpet to hard floors, you also need to adjust the height of the brush head. This is a neat trick that helps the vacuum to be as efficient as possible for each different surface, although it can take some getting used to having to alter it each time. Verdict: The Kirby Avalir 2 is able to do a whole lot of things, but the Dyson Ball Animal 2 has a much sleeker, more modern design, which makes it our favorite for this round.
We touched on this briefly in the last section, but when it comes to usability, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 is quite unique in that it has a ball shape to help it maneuver. On top of that, there is the 15 ft hose, which means that it is super easy to reach far away places.
Given that this is a vacuum that needs to be plugged in to work. It is heavy, so carrying it up and down stairs can be a pain, but other than that it moves really easily. The Kirby Avalir 2 is a similar weight, although slightly more, so it is also not that easy to carry around the place.
However, it is simple enough to drive. This is particularly due to its self-propelled transmission, which makes it pretty much drive itself while you just guide it. Also, while it is in canister mode, you are able to just maneuver the wand, with the canister following easily behind you. In terms of the extra features, the Kirby Avalir 2 is quite difficult to get used to. The Dyson Ball Animal 2 is a fair bit easier, as you just switch the tools to the brush head.
Verdict: Again, although the Kirby can do more, the Dyson is easier to use, so we will also give this round to Dyson. Dyson are pretty clear about the Dyson Ball Animal 2 having the strongest suction of any vacuum, although they do then clarify that they mean at the cleaner head.
And it is true, this Dyson vacuum is far more powerful than nearly all other vacuums, that is, except the Kirby Avalir 2. While the Dyson Ball Animal 2 has an air flow of 55 cfm cubic feet per minute , the Kirby Avalir 2 has an air flow of cfm. This makes it around 2. The Dyson Ball Animal 2 is great on all floors. However, the Kirby Avalir 2 takes carpet cleaning to the next level.
It is able to get dirt, sand, debris, and anything else out of the carpet, quickly and effectively. Part of the reason is that the brush head includes a strong agitation, which helps to move the dirt and collect it. There is no doubt about it, the power of the Kirby Avalir 2 is unparalleled, and makes it the clear winner for this round.
Needless to say, neither of these vacuums comes cheap. They are both top of the line, with outstanding power, excellent cleaning, multiple functions, and high-end designs. However, Kirby vacuums use quite a different selling model to the Dyson vacuums. They use a direct selling method, where they are available only from independent, authorized Kirby Distributors. This means that each set of distributors can set their own price, so they are often a bit more expensive. Even when they are re-sold after some use, the price tends to still be pretty high.
Verdict: The Kirby Avalir 2 has a pretty hefty price tag, which makes the Dyson Ball Animal 2 more appealing for this round. In a nutshell, the Dyson Ball Animal 2 has a sleeker design and a cheaper price tag, with intuitive tools that make it fairly simple to use. You can ensure that all of the dirt is removed from your carpets using these powerful machines.
Using a Dyson will leave you with a clean home after it has been used. The Dyson vacuum cleaner is designed not only for the household but also for commercial and on-the-go use. There are many different types and models of Dyson on the market, so no matter which Dyson is selected, you can always count on the same quality provided time after time. The bright colors of red, yellow and turquoise, to name but a few, make cleaning a delight and the ease of use makes an otherwise thankless job, much less of a chore.
The Dyson company comes up with innovative ways each year to improve on their original upright model that was first designed and manufactured over thirty years ago. That is why they are such a world-leading business. A vacuum cleaner must have good suction to be able to pull the most minute dirt particles from the carpet, therefore the performance of any vacuum cleaner depends on that suction power. The Kirby suction tube is double the size of the one used in Dyson cleaners, yet Dyson does not lose suction capacity despite the smaller suction tube.
In theory, smaller suction tubes get clogged up more often than the larger ones, so maybe the Dyson design is the exception to this rule. The Kirby vacuum cleaners use the conventional dust bag to collect the dirt, whereas the Dyson range collects dirt in the canister. The difference is that dust bags need to be constantly replaced while canisters just need to be removed and emptied into a dustbin when full. The Kirby brand of vacuum cleaners is made of light metal and offers better durability.
On the other hand, the Dyson company manufactures its vacuum cleaners from plastic. However, the notion that anything made from plastic is not durable is not true. Dyson vacuum cleaners come with a five-year parts and labor warranty. Whereas, Kirby vacuum cleaners come with only a three-year warranty on parts and labor. The Dyson cleaners are made from plastic and are lighter in weight when compared with Kirby cleaners which are made from light-weight metal.
Being lighter, it is easier to maneuver Dyson cleaners in and around hard to reach areas, such as under beds or sofas. Comparative tests on the Kirby and Dyson vacuum show which vacuum came out best in each category and may help in the ultimate choice but it is still the preference of the individual as to which vacuum is suitable for their needs. In tests, the air coming into the vacuum on the Kirby appeared to come from under the carpet, whereas on the Dyson, the air appeared to be coming from on top of the carpet.
Suction was greater in the Kirby all the way across the vacuum, but the Dyson had good suction on only one side of the power nozzle. According to tests, the Kirby and Dyson both had the same filtration. The Kirby vacuum also proved better than the Dyson in airflow tests, it had over 3 times more power and airflow than the Dyson when tested with an airflow meter.
Although the Dyson did not lose any power when full of dirt and the Kirby vacuum did lose power when full of dirt, the Kirby was still almost twice as powerful as the Dyson when full. In tests, the Kirby came out as the best cleaner because it pulled almost double the dirt from a carpet than the Dyson. Again, the Kirby came out as number 1 for reliability, with an average lifespan of 25 years and the least amount of repairs needed. With the Dyson weighing over 5 lbs.
Although Dyson won over Kirby with weight ease and on-board tools, it was the Kirby that took this title as it had about 3 times the tools and accessories as the Dyson.
Then we have the off balance suction, All of Dysons suction power is on one side unlike Kirbys centered and balanced powerhead. The Dyson is pretty and looks cool but compared to a Kirby you might as well be using a broom. On a calibrated air flow meter that reads a scale of 1 to 10 the Dyson scored a pathetic 2. The Kirby on the other hand scored off the scale well above So the testers added 10 extra feet of hose to the Kirby to lower the reading so it would show in the scale.
Now get this Even sucking though 10 extra feet of hose the kirby still produced 3 times as much airflow while consuming 66 percent less power. The final results were Kirby wins Kirby 7. Now on to the suction test. The dyson managed a pathetic 1. The Kirby on the other hand produced an unbelievable Dyson shattering 12 pounds of suction, whats that like a percent more suction power all while consuming 66 percent less power Yes the Kirby literally obliterated the Dyson in every single scientific comparison ever conducted except for one.
Keep in mind though, even with a full bag a 20 year old Kirby has over 3 times the cleaning power and uses 66 percent less electricity. Like I said the Dyson is pretty and looks cool but compared to a Kirby you might as well be using a broom. I almost forgot to post the results of these two important tests.
As could be expected, Kirby obliterated Dyson in these tests as well. Full of dirt on the dirt meter the Dyson pulled a 2. The Kirby did loose power full of dirt pulled a 7 with a empty bag but was still almost twice as powerful full of dirt. The Dyson pulled a 2. In our dirt test Kirby dominated. It pulled up almost double of the dirt that the Dyson did. Best vacuum cleaner for wood and marble. Big house. Marble downstairs and wood upstairs loft and bedrooms?
Need help selecting a vacuum cleaner. Vacuum cleaner for area rugs? Best Vacuum? You know, a few other people on here have stated that its more obvious to do home challenges than trust in the science bit. As a homeowner in a large house, my Dyson runs rings around Kirby and after trialling the Kirby from a salesman who wanted an astronomical amount of money for the Kirby, I stuck to the Dyson. Also, had a look at a You Tube video which easily shows up what Kirby are bad at doing.
Unless you can get yourself a real life comparison of a Kirby vacuum and A Dyson then be prepared to be shocked. Yes, whilst Kirby are all metal in their construction, in the UK at least unless you have a larger home or mansion they are really too big, noisy, far too heavy and at cost price not worth considering. Dyson may offer 5 less years with a guarantee but they are far more versatile to use without being too much of a struggle.
All the Comparisons on Youtube comparing the Dyson with the Kirby are a joke. I have seen high school science classes come up with more convincingly accurate tests. Some dingbat throws down a hand full of dirt and then sweeps it once or twice with Kirby. Then they grab a Dyson and sweep the same area like 10 times and amazingly enough the Dyson actually picks up dirt.
Whats amazing is that people actually use these tests as a way of trying to prove that one vacuum is better then another. You would have to be an utter moron to fall for this kind of scam. We could easily reverse that test and I would be willing to bet one of my homes that the Kirby would pick up a bunch of dirt the Dyson left behind.
Those types of tests are really nothing more the con job a sales pitches intended to sell housewives something they already want. They are not accurate scientific evaluation. Thank god those of us who work at NASA are a bit more thorough then that otherwise we would have a bunch of dead astronauts. Why is it people fall for this type of crap.
For example the tempurpedic memory foam mattress who claims it is, that it was designed by NASA for astronauts. Okay did anyone actually think about this before buying one of these sweat boxs. Okay back to the Kirby vs Dyson The test I preformed was considerably more scientific. It was very accurate and the test results are repeatable and predictable.
The Dyson is nothing but snake oil. You will need an accurate digital scale 1 Kirby vacuum 1 brand new Kirby bag 1 Dyson Vacuum freshly cleaned 2 coffee cans Exactly 2 pounds of dirt measured on the digital scale.
Step 2 Place a coffee can on the digital scale and hit tar now add dirt to the can until you get exactly 1 pound. Repeat this step once more so you have two cans with exactly one pound of dirt in each can. Step 3 Carefully spread each can onto one of the two sections of carpet and then lightly pat the carpet so the dirt settles into the fibers.
Please note each vacuum is assigned to only one section of carpet. Step 4 Vacuum each test section, one test section of carpet per vacuum In my test I did 25 strokes which is probably close to what someone would do if they spilled something on their carpet. Step 5 Carefully remove the bag from the Kirby and weigh the bag subtracting the weight of the empty bag we noted earlier.
Step 5 Place an empty coffee can on the scale and hit tar now empty the dyson container and weigh the contents.. When I did my test the Dyson managed to pull up 4oz of dirt. The Kirby picked up a Dyson shattering 14 oz of dirt or 87 percent of the dirt that was spilled on the test section. Once again the results are hard to argue with Dyson picked up 4 of 16 oz Kirby picked up 14 of 16 oz.
This is how an accurate comparison is done and in this test the Kirby demonstrated an astonishing times more cleaning power then the Dyson. Give it a try yourself the results are hard to argue with when you see it first hand. It would be a lot easer to take them seriously if they simply admitted that they bought their Dyson simply because it was the new cool product to own and they wanted it because the "In crowd" owns them.
Some of us are more interested in performance not vanity and when it comes to performance the Kirby obliterated the Dyson in every scientific test ever preformed! I bought my Dyson because I wanted a bagless vacuum that emptied easily. It is as simple as that. I have both - and use both! So, I bought a Kirby and it does the job wonderfully. I use the Kirby exclusively on my carpets now. So why do I need the Dyson?
Well, I use the Dyson for my hardwoods, tile, and for getting cobwebs out of the corners, etc. So, the Dyson wins for ease of use, but the Kirby still out-cleans the Dyson that black rug is a great test as everything shows on that thing! Ive been coming to this site for a while mostly for lawn care tips. You folks are very helpful!
However, I recently purchased a Dyson DC animal after doing a great deal of research on the subject so this forum topic peaked my interest. Ive never posted here, but Ive received so much help with my lawn from the members here I thought should give something back.
Im not a salesman or a vacuum cleaner expert, but I am a licensed professional engineer so I was also intrigued by the "scientific" arguments in this post as well. One of the things I noticed during the course of my web research is that when you use the common search engines for reviews or comparisons of Dyson to other high end vacuums that the top 3 or 4 search results on Google are reviews done marketers and salesmen e.
All of these reviews rave about how Kirby, Filter Queen, Rainbow, etc. If I were a vacuum salesman, it would be in my best interest to reach the same conclusion as well. Kirbys are sold door to door and the huge mark-up goes up the sales chain in commissions. The other high end machines are about the same price and use the same sales methods and commission structure. Salesmen also claim that the models with bags are much cleaner because you dont get the puff of dust when you empty the canister.
I dont think this is a valid argument. Ive changed lots of vacuum bags in my day and you get the same puff of dirt you get with a bag-less. In any case, its in the salesmens interest to sell you a model that uses bags because they sell bags. Honestly, Im all for capitalism, but I also dont like wasting money. Kohls will not be making any money from me on belts or bags because the Dyson has neither. The tests being cited in favor of Kirby in the previous posts completely miss the point and arent exactly done by independent professionals in my estimation.
Other objectives should look at: How hard is it to use? What does the machine weigh? Are the attachments easy to use? Do I need special tools? For me it was very important to be able to clean the roller bar easily as my wife has very long hair. You cant measure these things scientifically. I love how the "greatvacs guy" timed himself walking to a pretend closet to get his Kirby attachments.
Really the only science that applies is the suction power. At least Dyson tells you in airwatts what the power is rather then using some hokey ball meter that measures from 1 to 10 or proving it has no power by vacuuming over the same spot. The model I purchased is rated at airwatts. This is more than enough to thoroughly clean my thick pile carpets and pick up all the hair. I was going to go on and pick apart the experiments cited above but I think Ive made my case.
In short, the best reviews of appliances tend to be in forums like this or on amazon where people who use all the features share their experiences. There are very few unhappy Dyson customers out there unless you ask a Kirby salesman. Ok, just exactly what are air watts? Show proof of air watts on both the dyson and the kirby and how it relates to good carpet cleaning with a vacuum cleaner.
What is suction power? Are you talking inches of water lift? Air flow is what matters most on carpet and the Dyson isnt in the same league as the kirby in that area. Thick pile carpets are where the Dyson struggles the most. Anyone who believes otherwise is only kidding themselves. Its a unit to actually measure the power of the suction. It has real engineering units unlike a spring ball that reads 1 to 10 of some unknown value.
Air flow is not what matters most. Its a combination of flow and differential pressure. In any case airwatts gets my carpet plenty clean. I get down real real close with a magnifying glass. Nope still no dirt. It is not a scientific review, but it is an honest review that covers all aspects of both vacuums in typical home use. That video has several flaws. Look at the Kirby bag when she turns it on, you dont see the bag inflate indicating either a real full bag or a partial clog.
Secondly, notice where she has the height adjustment set on the Kirby. Down to its lowest setting which robs it of its airflow. She obviously doesnt even know how to use the machine properly. I will go with the above posters test where the Kirby outperformed the Dyson in picking up the pound of dirt.
Pretty much sums up the comparison for me. Of course everyone will believe what they choose, fact or not. I guess I havent explained myself very well and this whole thing got way off track. My entire point is that there is much more than suction power to accomplishing the mission of cleaning a carpet. Kirby does one thing well. In fact, in the link I posted above, she reaches the same conclusion. My opinion is that if I can get my carpet clean with airwatts, why do I need or 10, airwatts?
The Kirby designers really miss the boat when it comes to practical every day use. Factoring all this in with the ridiculous sales commissions makes it very hard to make a case as to why a Kirby is better overall. Does the Kirby pull more suction? It probably does, but if I have a clean carpet and floors at the end of the job and I accomplished this quickly without frustration I dont care which one has more suction.
I could design a vacuum that uses a jet engine and post all kinds of experiments that show how my jet outperforms everyone elses vacuum, it would be kind of loud and hard to push around and require maintenance crews, suck up pets, need jet fuel etc. Does that make it better for the job? In my opinion, if you have want to spend a lot of money on a sweeper look at Miele, Dyson, Panasonic, or Sebo. My preference is Dyson because it doesnt have belts or bags to deal with. However, the others get excellent real reviews from real users and appear to be great machines.
Stay away from sweepers that require a second mortgage and dont fall for gimmicky sales demonstrations that use "science". Look for reviews by users that discuss practical every day use of the machine. You mention not having bags or belts to deal with and so does the mom who rated the machines in the link you provided. The Dyson DC25 does have a belt, part number available from Searspartsdirect.
No bags but it does have 2 filters, one prefilter and one hepa post filter. I dont think the Kirby is a user friendly vacuum at all. I just believe that it will clean circles around any Dyson on Carpet,period. Ah good point. There is a little belt from the small motor in the brush head to the roller.
Its just not the typical big fat belt that drives everything and smokes up the house with burnt rubber smell like my old Hoover Wind Tunnel. As far as the filters they are reusable and you need to rinse them under a faucet every 3 months. Not too much effort. I appreciate the lively debate as well. Most Hepa filters that are washable are also restrictive as well, again hurting air flow.
Air flow is the most important factor in Carpet cleaning, less important in bare floor cleaning and attachment use where water lift and air watts may mean more. I personally wouldnt own either but if I were to choose just one to keep my carpet the cleanest, it would be the Kirby hands down.
Used model at hundreds less than the door to door asking price but at the same price as a new Dyson, still a better overall carpet cleaner. If I have nothing but hard flooring or tile and a couple of area rugs I may choose the Dyson but again a used one as they are high priced for what they offer cleaning wise and most importantly durability wise.
The brushroll or roller on some of the Dyson models is the cheesiest that I have seen, comparable to 49 dollar closeout models offered at discount stores. Dyson vacuums are comparable to the Fantom vacuums of old which went out of business. Dyson has a much better advertising program but the actual machines arent much better. For you folks that love them, wait until you really need some type of service, Dyson doesnt care about the service end of things, they only care about selling machines.
A local repair shop that is very reputable was dropped by Dyson because they couldnt sell 30 machines a month. Now in my area, if you need warranty work you have to ship your Dyson to New York or somewhere to get the work done. Everyone has their choice of vacuum and their reason why they like the machine. Give it a couple of years and more and more people will have bad things to say about the Dyson because they dont give a darn about service and with their advertising budget and the current economy things will only get worse.
I am not a Kirby dealer but I would buy a used American made Kirby over a new Dyson everyday of the week. Dysons are made in Maylasia I think. The Dyson is a fad machine that isnt very well made and overly advertised to make people think it is the best thing since sliced bread. It is a poor vacuum at best. Now I will shut up and let you folks get on with your arguments about which is better and why.
Buy American, we as a nation need that right now. Sorry, but "buy American" is a p! Yes, I am still waiting for the chance to see how Dyson handles repairs. I bought my Dyson in February Meanwhile, 6. No belt change yet? Interesting because your machine uses regular rubber belts that stretch out without even being used. With 6 yrs of use I can guarantee your belts need changing on a DC07 if that is indeed what you have. And if the Hepa filter is 6 yrs old it should have been changed several times by now.
If one were using that machine regularly on carpet the bristles on the brushroll would be pretty worn by now as well. And if one were regularly using the dusting brush with the flimsly nylon bristles that would be pretty worn by now as well. A 6 and a half year old Dyson that has never had the filter changed or the belts changed is not working "properly", Might as well be using a 50 dollar throw away vac as it would outperform the Dyson at that point.
In all honesty you should check into having the belts replaced and find out what the cost is or if you can find someone who will do it, then report back. Your machine will perform much better with the proper maintenance,Dyson or not. I would love to hear what you are quoted for the belt change on your DC I have re read through many posts concerning the Dyson and I find it hard to believe that none of the Dyson owners that post here have not had a belt or brush roller problem.
I saw 6 of them in the local repair shop at the same time. They all had the same thing in common. Belt and or clutch or brushroll problems. As far as the belts or clutch goes on the DC07 and 14 models, here is a video for the do it yourselfer that some might find helpful. I did this on a friends 07 before this video was out. It took me around an hour and a half because I wasnt familiar with the job.
This video would have helped but you would still need to purchase the belt lifter kit and the torx screwdriver if you dont have one already. The belt lifter tool looks like it would help make things easier on the job as I used large screwdrivers to lift the belt over the roller and it wasnt easy. I heartily disagree that maintenance concerns warrants the purchase of a new Kirby over a Dyson or Miele, or a Panasonic.
A new Kirby has a lifetime warranty that is non-transferable, so if you buy a used one you are paying out of pocket according to the Kirby website. What the Kirby warranty covers Im not sure. If the lifetime warranty is such a great selling point why not advertise the details?
In any case, a new Dyson has a 5 year parts and labor warranty and clearly state the terms on their website. Suppose I throw my Dyson in the trash at the end of the 5-year warranty period just because I never want to pay out of pocket for repairs. I could purchase another at 5 years and another 10 years down the road before Ive caught up to the original Kirby price.
If you throw in the price of the Kirby repairs, belts, and bags over 15 years you could easily cover the cost of a 4th Dyson to get you to the 20 year mark. Dyson wont replace the filter because it is supposedly lifetime. Locally you have to ship your Dyson at your cost to Dyson to have it fixed. I have heard of people being without their machine for over a month.
Hopefully those of you that do have Dysons will also have a local Dyson warranty facility to help you with any problems that may occur. Here is over 50 pages of reviews from real people about what you can expect when dealing with Kirby.
Вот хочу этот продать и купить маленький дайсон. А вообще нравится. Мне кажется что он шумный по сравнению с мешочными пылесосами. У нас Кирби-я дольна как слон,я алергик на пыль-разница с обычным ощутимая. Удалить форматирование. Допустимо не более 75 смайлов. Отображать как ссылку. Очистить редактор. Загрузите или вставьте изображения по ссылке. Вся активность Главная Дела житейские Добрые советы дайсон или кирби? Ответить в тему Создать новую тему. Назад 1 2 Далее Страница 1 из 2.
Рекомендуемые сообщения. Опубликовано 2 Октября Поделиться этим сообщением Ссылка на сообщение Поделиться на других сайтах. Опубликовано 3 Октября Опубликовано 4 Октября Я бы дайсон взяла и очиститель воздуха. Опубликовано 6 Октября Мне нравится наш Дайсон где-то тема была уже про них , но тожекажется шумноват после всех этих "ультрасайленсеров", зато и чистит непревзойденно!
А что это за электрощетка? Вы пишете от имени гостя.